Description:
(abstract)The aim of this commentary is to bring attention of the scientific community to erroneous claims about the existence of a new compound, “Ba3Bi2WO9”, as reported in [Inorg. Chem. Commun. 1530 (2023) 110785]. In this commentary, it is shown that the absence of phase-analysis procedures and incorrect indexing led to erroneous claims. It is demonstrated that a so-called “Ba3Bi2WO9” was a mixture of four phases: BaBiO3-d (a cubic perovskite with a = 4.3575 Å), Ba3W2O9, BaWO4, and a cubic perovskite with a = 4.225 Å.
Rights:
Keyword: X-ray diffraction, phase analysis, lattice parameters
Date published: 2024-05-24
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Journal:
Funding:
Manuscript type: Author's version (Accepted manuscript)
MDR DOI:
First published URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138735
Related item:
Other identifier(s):
Contact agent:
Updated at: 2024-08-19 11:29:19 +0900
Published on MDR: 2026-05-24 08:31:56 +0900
| Filename | Size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filename |
Ba3Bi2WO9-comment-160524-R.pdf
(Thumbnail)
application/pdf |
Size | 428 KB | Detail |