# Fileset

[Iodonium-based pro-adhesive layers for robust adhesion of PEDOT PSS to surfaces.pdf](https://mdr.nims.go.jp/filesets/b9da2db0-1f9b-474a-9e24-1b8b18b4add2/download)

## Creator

Szymon Smołka, Taral Patel, Sandra Pluczyk-Małek, Roman Turczyn, Katarzyna Krukiewicz

## Rights

[Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

## Other metadata

[Iodonium-based pro-adhesive layers for robust adhesion of PEDOT:PSS to surfaces](https://mdr.nims.go.jp/datasets/84424754-de59-436b-8ed6-a3e047cca67e)

## Fulltext

Microsoft Word - AMO_TSTA_A_2338786.docxFull Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttps://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tsta20Science and Technology of Advanced MaterialsISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/tsta20Iodonium-based pro-adhesive layers for robustadhesion of PEDOT:PSS to surfacesSzymon Smołka, Taral Patel, Sandra Pluczyk-Małek, Roman Turczyn &Katarzyna KrukiewiczTo cite this article: Szymon Smołka, Taral Patel, Sandra Pluczyk-Małek, Roman Turczyn& Katarzyna Krukiewicz (04 Apr 2024): Iodonium-based pro-adhesive layers for robustadhesion of PEDOT:PSS to surfaces, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, DOI:10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786To link to this article:  https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786© 2024 The Author(s). Published by NationalInstitute for Materials Science in partnershipwith Taylor & Francis Group.View supplementary material Accepted author version posted online: 04Apr 2024.Submit your article to this journal Article views: 39View related articles View Crossmark datahttps://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tsta20https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/tsta20?src=pdfhttps://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/suppl/10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/suppl/10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=tsta20&show=instructions&src=pdfhttps://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=tsta20&show=instructions&src=pdfhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786?src=pdfhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786?src=pdfhttp://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786&domain=pdf&date_stamp=04 Apr 2024http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786&domain=pdf&date_stamp=04 Apr 2024ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT1  Publisher: Taylor & Francis & The Author(s). Published by National Institute for Materials Science in partnership with Taylor & Francis Group. Journal: Science and Technology of Advanced Materials DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786 Iodonium-based pro-adhesive layers for robust adhesion of PEDOT:PSS to surfaces Szymon Smołkaa, Taral Patela,b, Sandra Pluczyk-Małeka,c, Roman Turczyna,c, Katarzyna Krukiewicza,c,* aDepartment of Physical Chemistry and Technology of Polymers, Silesian University of Technology, M. Strzody 9, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland  bJoint Doctoral School, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland cCentre for Organic and Nanohybrid Electronics, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 22B, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland * Correspondence: Katarzyna Krukiewicz, katarzyna.krukiewicz@polsl.pl https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1080/14686996.2024.2338786&domain=pdfACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT2   Iodonium-based pro-adhesive layers for robust adhesion of PEDOT:PSS to surfaces Electrochemical grafting of organic molecules to metal surfaces has been well-known as an efficient tool enabling tailored modification of surface at the nanoscale. Among many compounds with the ability to undergo the process of electrografting, iodonium salts belong to less frequently used, especially when compared with the most popular diazonium salts. Meanwhile, due to their increased stability, iodonium salts may be used in situations where the use of diazonium salts is constrained. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the electrochemical reduction of iodonium salts on the physicochemical properties of Pt electrodes, and the possibility to form pro-adhesive layers facilitating further functionalization purposes. Consequently, we have selected four commercially available iodonium salts (diphenyliodonium chloride, bis(4-tertbutylphenyl)iodonium hexafluorophosphate, (4-nitrophenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)iodonium triflate, bis(4-methylphenyl)iodonium hexafluorophosphate), and attached them to the surface of Pt electrodes by means of an electrochemical reduction process. As-formed layers were then extensively characterized in terms of wettability, roughness and charge transfer properties, and used as pro-adhesive coatings prior to the deposition of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate), PEDOT:PSS. Due to the increase in hydrophilicity and roughness, modified electrodes increased the stability of PEDOT:PSS coating while maintaining its high capacitance. Keywords: Adhesion; Charge storage capacity; Charge transfer; Electrografting; Iodonium salts; PEDOT:PSS   ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT3  1. Introduction In the realm of surface functionalization, diazonium salts have emerged as remarkable and versatile tools enabling tailored modification of surface at the nanoscale (1,2). The ability of diazonium salts to functionalize a diverse array of substrates has ignited a substantial interest, fueling their adoption in various fields (3). These compounds, possessing an aryl-diazonium group, exhibit inherent electroactivity that renders them suited for direct attachment to surfaces through a process of electrochemical reduction. By capitalizing on the electrochemical properties of diazonium salts, researchers have unlocked an innovative approach to tailor surface characteristics, in terms of wettability, roughness, as well as chemical and biological activity (4). The versatility of diazonium salts is demonstrated through a range of applications across diverse fields, including the development of corrosion-resistant coatings, enhancement of biocompatibility of biomedical devices, and modification of conductive materials for advanced electronics (5–7). The electrodeposition of diazonium salts involves the controlled reduction of the aryl-diazonium group, leading to its covalent bonding with the substrate (8). Exploring the intricate mechanism underlying this reaction unveils fundamental principles driving the selectivity and efficiency of diazonium salt-based surface functionalization. A key to the success of diazonium salt-based surface modification is the careful optimization of reaction conditions (4). Despite their remarkable versatility, diazonium salts do possess limitations, including low solubility in aqueous media, the need to assure substrate compatibility and challenges in achieving uniform coverage over large surface areas (9). To expand the pool of plausible grafting agents, a wide variety of diazonium salt alternatives that possess stable precursors, including alkyl and aryl iodides (10), sulfonium (11) and iodonium salts (12) has been used so far. Amongst them, iodonium salts have emerged as a potentially preferred choice due to their increased stability, ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT4  particularly when compared with diazonium salts (13). Iodonium salts, which are characterized by the presence of an aryl-iodonium group, offer a unique set of attributes that position them as superior agents for surface modification. The inherent reactivity of iodine and the electroactivity of the iodonium moiety synergize to enable efficient and controlled surface functionalization (14). This synergy allows for the direct and site-specific attachment of functional groups, facilitating the formation of surfaces with finely tuned chemical, physical, and electrical properties (15). The distinct reactivity of iodonium salts opens the door to a wide array of applications, spanning fields from materials science to biomedical engineering (16). One of the foremost advantages of iodonium salts lies in their increased stability compared to diazonium salts (17). Iodonium salts exhibit greater tolerance to a variety of reaction conditions, including temperature and pH fluctuations (18). This resilience enables researchers to explore a broader range of substrates and experimental environments without compromising the success of the modification process. Furthermore, the stability of iodonium salts contributes to an enhanced shelf life, ensuring consistent and reproducible outcomes over extended periods (19). Both diazonium and iodonium salts are known to serve as ‘molecular glues’; electrodeposition of these salts yields the formation of organic layers with pro-adhesive properties, able to serve as coupling agents for further functionalization purposes (7). One of the most notable applications of electrodeposited diazonium salts is their use as an interfacial layer between the surface of the electrode and a conducting polymer layer, resulting in the formation of a conducting coating characterized by a better affinity to the electrode and higher adhesion force (20). Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate), PEDOT:PSS, is a conducting polymer which, due to its high electrical conductivity and thermal stability, is widely used in ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT5  numerous applications, including photovoltaics (21,22), energy storage devices (23), bioelectronics (24), biosensors (25,26), wearable devices (27,28) and biofuel cells (29). PEDOT:PSS can be also used as a coating for biomedical devices, such as neural implants (30). Despite the promising properties of PEDOT:PSS, however, there are still several key problems to solve before this polymer can be widely used in biomedicine. One of the major limitations of PEDOT:PSS is its poor adhesion, which causes the polymer to swell and detach from the electrode’s surface. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to solve this problem, such as the use of a layer of hydrophilic adhesive strongly adhering to the substrate through which a conducting polymer can penetrate (31), by attaching PEDOT to a previously modified substrate using diazonium salts (32), by plasma treatment (32), or by solvent treatment, which also increases the conductivity of the polymer (33).  In our previous work, we found that the modification of a surface of an electrode with a post-diazonium layer has a positive effect on the adhesion of PEDOT:PSS (20). In this study, we aimed to examine whether iodonium salts can also facilitate the adhesion of PEDOT:PSS, and whether they could outperform diazonium salts, while eliminating their disadvantages. Consequently, we selected four commercially available iodonium salts, and attached them to the surface of a Pt electrode by means of an electrochemical reduction process. As-formed layers were then extensively characterized, and used as pro-adhesive coatings prior to the deposition of PEDOT:PSS through a drop casting technique. The functionality of deposited PEDOT:PSS was evaluated in terms of its electrical properties, and its stability was estimated after 30 days of ageing with the use of UV-Vis spectroscopy. Previously, few papers describing the influence of iodonium salts on polymer adhesion were published  (34–37), but none of them concerned surface modification through grafting of those salts. Iodonium salts ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT6  were used as photoinitiators in ternary system, where their addition led to better adhesion and mechanical properties of biomedical resin (35,36) or adhesives used in dental application (34,37). To the best of our knowledge, there are no previous investigation on the effect of grafting iodonium salts on the adhesion of polymers, in particular PEDOT:PSS. 2. Materials and methods 2.1 Reagents Diphenyliodonium chloride, bis(4-tertbutylphenyl)iodonium hexafluorophosphate, (4-nitrophenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)iodonium triflate, bis(4-methylphenyl)iodonium hexafluorophosphate, tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (tBuNPF6) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) tablets (Fisher Bioreagents) were dissolved in deionized water to obtain a solution containing 0.01 M phosphate buffer, 0.0027 M KCl and 0.127 M NaCl. Acetonitrile (ACN, 99.9%), ferrocene, KNO3 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. tBuNPF6 was vacuum dried before use. Aqueous dispersion of PEDOT:PSS was purchased from either Ossila (PH1000) or Sigma Aldrich (1.1%), as indicated. Other reagents were used as received.  2.2 Electrochemical studies  Electrochemical reduction of bis(4-tertbutylphenyl)iodonium hexafluorophosphate (Salt A), (4-nitrophenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)iodonium triflate (Salt B), diphenyliodonium chloride (Salt C) and bis(4-methylphenyl)iodonium hexafluorophosphate (Salt D), was carried out using CHI 660 potentiostat (Texas, USA). A conventional three electrode setup was used consisting of a platinum disc or thermanox coverslips (Thermo Scientific NuncTM, 22 mm × 60 mm) coated with a sputter-coated platinum layer ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT7  (Q150R Quorum technologies, UK) as a working electrode, Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) (eDAQ) reference electrode (for aqueous solutions) or Ag wire pseudoreference electrode (for organic solutions) and a platinum auxiliary electrode. The potential of the pseudoreference electrode was monitored using ferrocene (Fc). Salts A, B and D (3 mM) were dissolved in ACN containing 0.1 M tBuNPF6 as a supporting electrolyte. Salt C (3 mM) was dissolved in deionized water containing 0.1 M KNO3 as a supporting electrolyte. The deposition process was carried out by the means of cyclic voltammetry within the potential ranges: from -0.4 V to -1.6 V vs. Fc/Fc+ (salt A), from 0 V to -0.8 V vs. Fc/Fc+ (salt B), from -0.1 V to -0.7 V vs. Fc/Fc+ (salt C) and from -0.5 V to -1.5 V vs. Fc/Fc+ (salt D), at the scan rate of 50 mV/s. Following the electrochemical reduction, modified electrodes were analyzed by means of an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) employing CHI 660c potentiostat. The measurements were conducted in a PBS solution in the frequency range from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz, and AC amplitude of 50 mV. The results were shown in the form of Nyquist and Bode plots. Data fitting was performed with the use of EIS spectrum analyzer software with a Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm (38). Capacitance, C (µF) of a constant phase element (CPE) was calculated by using the following equation (20)  𝑪 = 𝑸⋅𝑹𝑪𝑻 𝟏𝒏𝑹𝑪𝑻  (1) where Q is the CPE parameter, RCT is the charge transfer resistance (Ω) and n is the CPE exponential parameter.  All experiments were performed at room temperature and pressure (20°C, 1 atm), in the absence of purging preceding to the measurement.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT8  2.3 Electrogravimetric investigation of deposition process Electrogravimetric investigations were performed via a time resolved electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM, CHI 400C) using CHI 125 gold crystal electrodes. The deposition process was carried out by the means of cyclic voltammetry within the potential ranges: from -0.4 V to -1.6 V (salt A), from -0.4 V to -1.2 V (salt B), from -0.1 V to -0.7 V (salt C) and from -0.4 V to -1.6 V (salt D), at the scan rate of 50 mV/s. Deposited masses were calculated by using a Sauerbrey equation (39):  ∆𝒇 = − 𝟐𝒇𝟎𝟐𝑨 𝝆𝒒𝝁𝒒 ∆𝒎  (2) where: 𝝆𝒒 means a density of quartz (2.648 g/cm3), 𝝁𝒒 is a shear modulus of quartz (2.947∙1011 g cm/s2), A is an electrode surface (0.205 cm2), 𝒇𝟎 is a resonant frequency of the fundamental mode (Hz), ∆𝒎 is a mass change (g). For 𝒇𝟎 = 7.995 MHz, the mass change correlated to a change of 1 Hz of frequency is equal to 1.4 ng. To eliminate the risk of overestimation of a deposited resulting from the electroreduction of Salt C, arising from the fact that one of the side products of this process (iodobenzene) is insoluble in aqueous medium, ∆𝒎 acquired for Salt C was multiplied by 0.274, since the mass of benzene ring which attaches to the surface is equal to 27.4% of molecular mass of Salt C. 2.4 Surface characteristics  Morphology of electrodeposited layers was examined with the use of an optical profilometer (Profilm 3D, Filmetrics) and an atomic force microscope (CoreAFM Nanosurf) with the application of a phase contrast (tapping mode) using Tapping Mode HQ:NSC15/AlBS AFM Probe (MikroMasch). Surface roughness was obtained according to ISO 25178 using an average surface parameter (Sa). Wettability of the ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT9  samples was analyzed by means of an optical goniometer (OCA15 Dataphysisc) at room temperature (20°C) using deionized water.  2.5 Deposition of PEDOT:PSS coating  PEDOT:PSS coatings were deposited on the surface of thermanox/platinum electrodes, previously modified with electroreduced iodonium salts. Substrates were covered with 100 µl of PEDOT:PSS (Ossila) using a drop-casting method and dried at 60°C for 30 minutes. 2.6 Electrical properties of PEDOT:PSS  The effect of the presence of an organic layer on electrical properties of PEDOT:PSS (Ossila) was examined with the use of cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Pt/Salt/PEDOT:PSS slides were used as working electrodes immersed in PBS, with a Ag/AgCl electrode as a reference, and Pt as a counter electrode. CV scans were performed with different scan rates (200 mV/s, 100 mV/s, 50 mV/s, 20 mV/s, 10 mV/s) at the potential range from -0.5 V to 0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl. Charge storage capacity, CSC (mC/cm2) was calculated by using the following equation (40):  𝑪𝑺𝑪 =  𝟏𝑨∙𝒗 𝑰 𝑽 𝒅𝑽𝑽𝟐𝑽𝟏  (3) where: A is electrode area (0.283 cm2), 𝒗 is a scan rate (V/s), 𝑽 is the potential (V) and I is current (A). V1 and V2 represent the potential range of a single scan. Electrochemical impedance spectra were collected in PBS solution (2 ml) in the frequency range from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz and an AC amplitude of 50 mV. The results were shown in the form of Nyquist and Bode plots. Data fitting was performed with the use of EIS spectrum analyzer software with a Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm (38). ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT10  2.7 Stability studies To investigate the effect of iodonium treatment on the adhesion of PEDOT:PSS (Ossila), an ageing experiment was carried out, in which the modified electrodes were immersed in equal volumes of PBS (2 ml).The bottles were tightly closed to limit the evaporation of the solution and left for 30 days in a dark place. After this time, the solutions were examined using UV-Vis spectroscopy (Hewlett Packard, HP 8453). CV curves were collected before and after an ageing test, and the corresponding CSC values were calculated according to eq. 3. The adhesion of PEDOT:PSS (Sigma Aldrich) to modified electrodes was tested by an adhesive tape test, as well. Thermanox/platinum electrodes were modified by studied salts and covered by 200 µl of 1.1% PEDOT:PSS (Sigma Aldrich) water dispersion using a drop casting method. The electrodes were dried at 60 °C for 30 min. After that, a commercially available adhesive tape was applied on a half of the electrode’s surfaces, and after 30 s it was removed at a constant force while maintaining 90o angle, the same for each sample.  3. Results and discussion 3.1 Electrodeposition of iodonium salts Four iodonium salts with varying functional groups were electrochemically reduced onto the surface of a platinum working electrode via cyclic voltammetry, and the CV curves are presented in Figure 1. Salt A, Salt B, and Salt D were dissolved in 0.1 M tBuNPF6/ACN to ensure the electroreduction process to take place. On the other hand, water-solubility of Salt C allowed the process of electroreduction to be performed in the 0.1 M KNO3/water system without the use of organic solvents, which greatly expanded its applicability and diminished costs.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT11  Different potential ranges have been selected for Salts A-D to assure their efficient electrodeposition, which occurred at the reduction potential of -1.2 V vs. Fc/Fc+ (Salt A), -0.8 V vs. Fc/Fc+ (Salt B), -0.4 V vs. Fc/Fc+ (Salt C), and -1.1 V vs. Fc/Fc+ (Salt D). Clearly, the least negative potential of electroreduction process was observed for Salt C, and this difference should be related to the nature of the solvent (water) and the presence of an unsubstituted aromatic ring. For Salt B and Salt C, the process of electroreduction was completed within 1 CV cycle, since there was no reduction peak observed in the next CV cycles. Such behaviour is expected to occur with the progress in electrode passivation as an outcome of the formation of an organic layer on the electrode surface blocking further electrochemical reaction [36]. For Salt A and Salt D, the reduction peaks were still noted in the subsequent CV cycles, however, slightly shifted to more negative potentials and characterized with less negative currents. It is possible that for these salts the aryl radicals formed as a result of electrochemical reduction of iodonium salts were further reduced yielding aryl anions, as observed previously (15,41) The reduction potentials of iodonium salts are approx. 0.5 V more negative than for their diazonium salt-based analogues, due to their higher stability when compared with diazonium salts (15). Iodine atom has a larger covalent radius (139 pm) than nitrogen (70 pm) and is characterized by a more diffuse electron density resulting in a more stable positive charge on the iodine atom, which makes the I-Ar bond less prone to cleavage. Even though this makes the electrografting process more challenging, since more negative potentials are required to initiate the process of deposition, higher stability of iodonium salts increases safety in their use by avoiding the possibility of rapid decomposition responsible for the explosive character of some diazonium salts. Iodonium salts follow a similar one electron mechanism of electroreduction as ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT12  diazonium salts (14) in which iodonium salt is reduced into the corresponding aryl radical attaching to the electrode surface and the charge stabilized counterpart of the molecule dissipates into the solution. Figure 2a shows the reaction mechanism followed by a schematic representation of organic compounds anchoring to the Pt surface after electrografting. As it can be seen in the diagram, half of the molecule is grafted onto the electrode surface, while the other half takes the form of the corresponding organic iodide. Ideally, an optimized process of electrochemical deposition of iodonium salts should provide an organic monolayer (7). However, the reactivity of iodonium salts favors the formation of multilayers, particularly when more than 1 CV cycle is performed (14) In the case of Salt B, which is an unsymmetrical molecule, the possibility of cleavage exists for both sides of the iodine cation, although only a part of the molecule with the nitro group in the para position can be deposited on the surface of the electrode due to steric hindrance (42,43). It is important to mention that asymmetrical iodonium salts usually can cleavage for both possible radicals, which can react with surface. One of the ways to obtain high regioselectivity is grafting via a plasmon-assisted transformation (44)Here, the regioselectivity is obtain due to the methyl groups attached in 2,4 and 6 position of phenyl ring in one of the part of molecule. The mechanism of attachment of aryl radical onto Pt electrode for Salt B is shown in Figure 2b. Mechanism pathway 1 is unattainable, therefore the deposition of Salt B proceeds through mechanism pathway 2. 3.2 Electrogravimetric analysis The electrografting process was studied with use of an electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance, which allowed to track changes in the mass of the working electrode as the function of applied potential (Figure 3). Salt A was deposited most efficiently ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT13  (778.3 ± 55.1 ng), whereas Salt B, Salt C and Salt D were deposited in a significantly lower quantity (81.3 ± 7.8 ng for Salt B, 270.7 ± 56.1 ng for Salt C and 340.6 ± 20.8 ng for Salt D, respectively). The variability in deposited mass can be easily explained by different structures of radicals formed through the process of electrochemical reduction, and their easiness to attach to the surface. In the case of Salt C, the amount of deposited mass was corrected by subtracting the mass of iodobenzene, a side produce of the electroreduction process, which is insoluble in water (45) and is adsorbed on the surface of the electrode (46). As shown in Figure 1, during the grafting process only half of the compounds react with the surface. The other half of the compounds forms an organoiodine derivative, i.e. 4-tertbutyliodobenzene, 2,4,6-trimethyliodobenzene, iodobenzene, or 4-iodotoluene for Salts A-D, respectively. Precipitation was not observed during the reduction of other salts, due to the solubility of 2,4,6-trimethyliodobenzene, iodobenzene and 4-tertbutyliodobenzene in acetonitrile (47). The low deposited mass in the case of the reduction of Salt B can be explained by the deactivating character of a nitro group.  3.3 Surface properties It is known that surface modification with a grafted organic layer may lead to a change in its wettability (48). To verify this thesis, water contact angle of modified electrodes was measured (Figure 4A). In general, electrografting of all investigated iodonium salts led to a decrease in surface wettability compared to the unmodified Pt surface (θ = 78 ± 1°). The lowest value of contact angle was noted for Salt D (θ = 61 ± 1°), which does not differ significantly from a contact angle of a surface modified with Salt B (θ = 63 ± 2°). Values closer to unmodified Pt were found for both Salt A (θ = 72 ± 2°) and Salt C (θ = 72 ± 1°). In general, wettability depends on the homogeneity of the surface, ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT14  substrate geometry, surface energy, surface roughness, etc. (49). Here, the difference in the contact angle of the modified electrodes and Pt is related to the substrate effect. For Salt A and Salt D, the presence of methyl group at terminal position influences the decrease in the contact angle, however the presence of a methyl group in Salt D significantly decreases the contact angle compared to the bulky group in Salt A. Even though the presence of nitro substituent is expected to lower the value of contact angle, the hydrophilic effect of this functional group is compensated by roughness of the surface, as discussed in the next sections (50).  All studied surfaces should be considered as moderately hydrophilic, making them suitable for the attachment of proteins, polymers, and polypeptides (31,51). This effect was observed in our previous study using Pt/thermanox electrodes modified through the electroreduction of the diazonium layers and functionalized with polylysine (13). Modification of the surface with a few nanometer thick adhesive layer of hydrophilic polymers (polyurethanes) was also introduced as an efficient method to achieve strong adhesion of different conducting polymers on various substrates, particularly under wet conditions (31). In the light of the above, it is expected that moderate hydrophilicity of electrode’s surfaces modified with electrodeposited iodonium salts should promote the adhesion of proteins, cells, and polymers, and particularly a water-based PEDOT:PSS dispersion. Surface roughness is another parameter that governs the adhesive nature of a substrate.  Unmodified Pt surface was found to be rather flat, with Sa of 0.03 ± 0.01 µm. Roughness of the modified electrodes, assessed by means of an optical profilometry (Figure S1), increased substantially (Figure 4B), with the most significant change noted for Salt A (Sa = 0.35 ± 0.07 µm), and the least change noted for Salt D (Sa = 0.04 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT15  ± 0.01 µm). This provides a profound insight into the electrodeposition process, suggesting that due to the steric hindrance, the organic layer derived from Salt A (containing a bulky tert-butyl group) is not as compact as in the case of Salt D (containing a single methyl group). The results acquired by means of optical profilometry were supported by the AFM images (Figure 5), in which all modified surfaces were confirmed to possess more developed surfaces. In the case of Salt C, an irregular pattern of round structures may indicate precipitated iodobenzene, as described in the Section 3.2. Basing on the data, we estimate the thickness to be in the sub-micron range (Figure S2). It is a well-known fact that adhesion is strictly related with surface roughness, and by modulating surface roughness, it is possible to form surfaces with either pro-adhesive or anti-adhesive properties [41,42]. Previous studies showed that rough surfaces can significantly facilitate the adhesion of polymers to metal substrates (52,53). For instance, it was found that a rough Pt surface provides better adhesion of PEDOT compared to a smooth Pt surface (54). Since after the modification of the Pt electrodes with iodonium salts surface roughness is increased for every investigated salt, we expect to observe better adhesion of polymers, and particularly PEDOT:PSS on the surface of modified electrodes.   3.4 Electrochemical properties Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was used to analyze the effect of the process of electrodeposition of iodonium salts on the electrochemical properties of Pt electrodes, including their conductivity and capacitance (Figure 6). Bode plots presenting the variation in the impedance module vs. frequency (Figure 6A) indicated a similar shape of the impedance profiles for all investigated samples, showing that the ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT16  modification did not compromise the conductivity of a Pt electrode. Bode plots presenting the variation in the phase angle vs. frequency (Figure 6B) indicated the capacitive behavior of all investigated surfaces, with a single peak at the frequency between 1-10 Hz, attributed to a single time constant resulting from the presence of a single capacitive element in the equivalent electric circuit. In an effort to describe the mechanism of charge transfer, modified Randles circuit was selected to represent the electrical behavior of coated electrodes. This circuit includes the following components: solution resistance (Rs), electrode capacitance (CPE), charge transfer resistance (RCT), and a parameter related to the diffusion of charge (W). Experimental data were fitted to match the proposed circuit, and resulting values were presented in Table 1 and Figure 6A-B (solid lines). The difference between electrical parameters of a bare Pt electrode and Pt electrodes coated with electroreduced iodonium salts indicated successful surface modification. It was particularly visible in the case of RCT, which is a predictor of the efficiency of charge transfer between the electrolyte and the electrode. For example, for the electrode modified with Salt C, RCT was equal to 451 ± 79 kΩ, and for the electrode modified with Salt D RCT was equal to 62 ± 1 kΩ. These values were much higher than the RCT for a bare Pt electrode (12.3 ± 0.7 kΩ), confirming the presence of the organic layer partially blocking the electron transfer on surface of the Pt electrode. The capacitive character of electrode modifications was confirmed by high values of n parameter, which approached 1 as in the case of the ideal capacitor. When comparing the double layer capacitance calculated from the constant phase element parameters according to the equation (1), the highest capacitance was noted for Salt B (693.5 ± 0.1 µF) and the lowest capacitance was noted for Salt D (30.4 ± 0.2 µF), which was slightly lower than the capacitance of an unmodified Pt electrode (42.2 ± 0.1 µF). ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT17  3.5 Case study: performance of PEDOT:PSS coated on electrodeposited iodonium-based layers As a case study used to verify the applicability of iodonium-derived organic layers, they were used to modify the surface of Pt electrode prior to the deposition of PEDOT:PSS. Since the presence of a pro-adhesive layer is expected to enhance charge transfer characteristics of the system, just as it was reported for diazonium-based coatings (20), the modified electrodes were investigated in terms of their electrochemical behavior. CV curves of all investigated samples (Figure 7A) show a shape typical for PEDOT:PSS, without clearly developed redox peaks (55). Interestingly, the recorded currents were higher for PEDOT:PSS deposited on the surface of modified electrodes than observed for PEDOT:PSS deposited directly on the surface of a Pt electrode, suggesting the positive effect of the presence of organic layer on the capacitance of PEDOT:PSS. The ability of investigated materials to accumulate electric charge was quantified in terms of a charge storage capacity, CSC (Figure 7B), which is a parameter used to measure the amount of charge that can be reversibly stored in the electrode per unit geometric area (56), what is particularly important in designing biomedical electrodes and energy storage devices (40). Interestingly, modification of Pt surface prior to the deposition of PEDOT:PSS layer led to the increase in the CSC values for all scan rates, with the most prominent effect for a surface modified with Salt D. For instance, at a scan rate of 100 mV/s, CSC for a surface of Pt/Salt D/PEDOT:PSS (70.9 mC/cm2) was 50% higher than the one calculated for a Pt/PEDOT:PSS surface (45.8 mC/cm2). The presence of Salt A and Salt B as the intermediate layer also led to higher CSC values, but with a lower extend than in the case of Salt D (CSC of 64.9 mC/cm2 and 67 mC/cm2 for Salt A and Salt B, respectively, at 100 mV/s).  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT18  EIS analysis was used to further evaluate electrical properties of PEDOT:PSS layers deposited on modified electrodes (Figure 7C-D). In contrast to the results presented in Figure 6A, where the presence of organic layers resulted in a partial blocking of the electrode’s surface and the slight increase in the impedance module, the Bode plots of PEDOT:PSS coated electrodes (Figure 7C) indicated the decrease in the impedance profile, particularly in the case of electrodes modified with Salt A and Salt D. The presence of two capacitive peaks in the phase angle vs. frequency Bode plots (Figure 7D) suggests that the electrical equivalent circuit suitable for the description of charge transfer processed occurring in Salt/PEDOT:PSS coatings should contain two capacitive elements. Accordingly, the experimental EIS data was fitted in the circuit consisting of a solution resistance (RS) connected in series with the first constant phase element (CPE1) connected in parallel with a resistor (RCT) connected in series with a second constant phase element (CPE2). For a Pt/PEDOT:PSS sample, the experimental data was fitted in the circuit, in which the second constant phase element was replaced with the Warburg diffusion element. This behavior corresponds to the presence of a single layer of PEDOT:PSS, without the presence of an additional organic moiety, which is evident in the Bode plot showing only one capacitive peak. The accuracy of the used model was confirmed by a low value of a deviation between experimental and fitted data (<2%). The presence of two capacitive elements is easily explained by the presence of two layers on the surface of the electrode that can participate in charge accumulation, namely an electrodeposited organic layer and a drop-casted PEDOT:PSS layer. The addition of a second capacitive element manifests the dominant capacitive behavior within the Pt/Salt/PEDOT:PSS systems. Still, the capacitive character of PEDOT:PSS is not ideal (n < 1), hence the system should be understood as a ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT19  pseudocapacitor, which is able to store charge both faradaically and through an electrical double layer [49].  While analyzing the parameters of the circuit (Table 2), it is clear that the presence of an organic deposit changes the conductivity of the electrode, what can be concluded from the values of the charge transfer resistance. After depositing PEDOT:PSS on the pretreated electrodes, charge transfer resistance is found to decrease from a kΩ range to Ω range, and more precisely to the values of 38.8 ± 0.9 Ω as noted for Pt/Salt C/PEDOT:PSS, 32.1 ± 0.8 Ω for Pt/Salt B/PEDOT:PSS, 16.8 ± 0.6 Ω for Pt/Salt D/PEDOT:PSS, and finally 8.1 ± 1.0 Ω for Pt/Salt A/PEDOT:PSS – all values lower than in the case of Pt/PEDOT:PSS without the presence of an organic layer (100 ± 8.9 Ω). The pre-exponential factor P associated with CPE2 also has a higher value for PEDOT:PSS coating on the surfaces modified with Salt B and Salt C compared to those modified with Salt A and Salt D, which shows that the capacitive behavior is also more dominant for Salt B and Salt C. This difference can be related to the functional groups present on the surface of the modified electrodes. The effect of electron donating (ED), electron withdrawing (EW) and bulky groups present on Pt surface can significantly impact the impedance of the surface. Nitro groups having the electron withdrawing effect decrease the electron density at Pt surface, which decreases the conductivity and increases the impedance as seen after coating the surface with PEDOT:PSS. However, electron donating groups (tert-butyl and methyl) increase the density of the electron on the surface enhancing the conductivity of the surface and decreasing the impedance [51]. This phenomenon can be observed in the high charge transfer resistance in case of Salt B and lower in Salt A and Salt D. ED and EW effects affect the adhesion of PEDOT:PSS on the surface and the impedance of the layers.  Apart from the effect of organic layers on the charge transfer mechanism, the ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT20  presence of such layers could also affect the adhesion of PEDOT:PSS, as shown in our previous study (20). To assess stability of PEDOT:PSS coatings deposited on the surface of iodonium-derived organic layers ageing test and tape test were performed. For an ageing test, the samples were subjected to a 30-day immersion in PBS, and the disintegration of the polymer layer was evaluated by analyzing traces of PEDOT (characteristic peak around 325 nm) and PSS (characteristic peaks at 250-270 nm) in the solution using UV-Vis spectroscopy (Figure 8A). Consequently, a substantial decrease in the absorbance in the region assigned to PSS was noted for the modified electrodes (except for Pt/Salt A/PEDOT:PSS), stating that these modifications increased the integrity of PEDOT:PSS coating by 16.6 % for Pt/Salt D/PEDOT:PSS and 53.4 % for Pt/Salt C/PEDOT:PSS (both values estimated basing on the absorbance at 268 nm), by eliminating the spontaneous elution of a doping agent, PSS. A large standard deviation between technical replicas of Pt/SaltB/PEDOT:PSS could suggest the inhomogeneity of the electrode after its modification with iodonium salts, leaving some uncoated areas that decreases its overall performance. In comparison with diazonium salts, iodonium salts showed a stronger effect on stability of PEDOT:PSS. In our previous article (20), the decrease in absorbance at 268 nm was lower than 2%, stating that the presence of diazonium moiety could only slightly decrease the rate at which PSS elutes into the solution.  The analysis of an electrochemical performance in terms of CSC change after subjecting the modified electrodes to ageing studies revealed the beneficial effect of the presence of iodonium-derived layers on the capacitance of PEDOT:PSS (Figure 8B-C). The highest decrease in CSC was observed for an unmodified Pt/PEDOT:PSS electrode (53.5%) highlighting its instability. The presence of an organic layer, particularly those derived from the reduction of Salt C and Salt D, was found to substantially reduce the ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT21  loss in CSC (Figure 8C), which was in line with the results acquired from UV-Vis stability studies. Interestingly, the capacitance of Pt/Salt C/PEDOT:PSS was found to improve by 20% as a result of ageing, which should be related to the changes in microstructural crystallinity and morphology upon immersion in an aqueous solution, as described earlier (57,58). An additional insight into the aqueous stability of PEDOT:PSS layers was provided by the results of a tape test (Figure S3). The visual inspection of surfaces after delamination indicated the beneficial effect of the presence of organic layers on the stability of a PEDOT:PSS film, with the exception of the surface modified with Salt C, where the delamination was observed exactly in the place where the electrode was immersed during the electrografting process, indicating the weak adhesive properties of this salt.  Raman spectra were collected to monitor the chemical composition of the electrodes before and after a tape test (Figure 9). The results showed the characteristic peaks for PEDOT:PSS at 1573 cm-1 (PEDOT Cα=Cβ), 1446 cm-1 (PEDOT Cα=Cβ), 1256 cm-1 (PEDOT Cα=Cα`), 993 cm-1 (PSS), 579 cm-1 (PEDOT C-O), which were present in every sample (with a negligible peak shift) before the tape test (59,60). Interestingly, Raman spectra collected on the surface of the electrodes after delamination also showed some peaks corresponding to the PEDOT:PSS (particularly for Salt B and Salt D), suggesting that a thin layer of PEDOT:PSS was still present on the surface. 4. Conclusion  In this study, we have verified the applicability of the process of electrochemical reduction of iodonium salts as way to form pro-adhesive coatings for the further deposition of PEDOT:PSS. Among investigated salts, it was bis(4-methylphenyl)iodonium hexafluorophosphate (Salt D) that produced organic layers able ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT22  to increase the electrochemical performance of PEDOT:PSS in terms of high charge storage capacity (70.9 mC/cm2 at 100 mV/s) and low charge transfer resistance (16.8 ± 0.6 Ω), as well as increase its stability, most probably because of its most hydrophilic character among investigated surfaces (θ = 61 ± 1°). By the possibility to undergo the changes in microstructural crystallinity and morphology upon immersion in an aqueous solution, PEDOT:PSS deposited on the electrode modified with Salt D showed an increase in the capacitance as a result of ageing.  Our research proves that iodonium salts can be successfully treated as substituents for diazonium salts in the processes of surface modification. Such a conversion is particularly important in applications where spontaneous reduction is undesirable, e.g. pattering, but the need to use more negative potentials must be considered. Selected iodonium salts may be successfully used as “molecular glues”, increasing the adhesion of conducting polymers simultaneously improving their electrochemical properties. Since conducting polymer-coated electrodes are widely used in a variety of applications, from biomedical engineering to energy storage devices, the results of our studies are expected to further improve these fields by providing materials with enhanced stability and performance. 5. Acknowledgement  This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland [OPUS 2019/35/B/ST5/00995].  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT23  References:  1. Combellas C, Kanoufi F, Pinson J, et al. Sterically hindered diazonium salts for the grafting of a monolayer on metals. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(27):8576–7.  2. Pinson J, Podvorica FI. Surface modification of materials: Electrografting of organic films. Curr Opin Electrochem. 2020 Dec 1;24:44–8.  3. Kher K, Dhaker M, Baroliya PK. Recent advances in electrochemical functionalization using diazonium salts. Org Biomol Chem. 2023;7052–61.  4. Hetemi D, Noël V, Pinson J. Grafting of Diazonium Salts on Surfaces: Application to Biosensors. Biosensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 15;10(1):4.  5. Jlassi K, Radwan AB, Sadasivuni KK, et al. Anti-corrosive and oil sensitive coatings based on epoxy/polyaniline/magnetite-clay composites through diazonium interfacial chemistry. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–13.  6. Chaussé A, Chehimi MM, Karsi N, et al. The electrochemical reduction of diazonium salts on iron electrodes. The formation of covalently bonded organic layers and their effect on corrosion. Chemistry of Materials. 2002;14(1):392–400.  7. Patel T, Huang J, Krukiewicz K. Multifunctional organic monolayer-based coatings for implantable biosensors and bioelectronic devices: Review and perspectives. Biosens Bioelectron X. 2023 Sep;14:100349.  8. Tavakkoli Z, Goljani H, Sepehrmansourie H, et al. New insight into the electrochemical reduction of different aryldiazonium salts in aqueous solutions. RSC Adv. 2021;11(42):25811–5.  9. Mesnage A, Lefèvre X, Jégou P, et al. Spontaneous grafting of diazonium salts: Chemical mechanism on metallic surfaces. Langmuir. 2012;28(32):11767–78.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT24  10. González MCR, Carro P, Hernández Creus A. Morphological Changes in Electrografted Aryl‐Based Thin Films Induced by using Diazonium Salts or Aryl Iodides. ChemElectroChem. 2018 Feb 12;5(3):464–70.  11. Vase KH, Holm AH, Norrman K, et al. Electrochemical Surface Derivatization of Glassy Carbon by the Reduction of Triaryl- and Alkyldiphenylsulfonium Salts. Langmuir. 2008 Jan 1;24(1):182–8.  12. Koefoed L, Pedersen SU, Daasbjerg K. Grafting of Aryl Diazonium, Iodonium, and Sulfonium Salts in Unusual Patterns by Exploiting the Potential Gradient in Bipolar Electrochemistry. ChemElectroChem. 2016 Mar 13;3(3):495–501.  13. Patel T, Skorupa M, Skonieczna M, et al. Surface grafting of poly-L-lysine via diazonium chemistry to enhance cell adhesion to biomedical electrodes. Bioelectrochemistry. 2023 Aug 1;152:108465.  14. Guselnikova O, Soldatova NS, Postnikov PS. Iodonium Salts as Reagents for Surface Modification: From Preparation to Reactivity in Surface-Assisted Transformations. In: Chehimi MM, Pinson J, Mousli F, editors. Aryl Diazonium Salts and Related Compounds. Physical Chemistry in Action. Cham: Springer; 2022. P 79-96. 15. Romańczyk PP, Kurek SS. Reliable reduction potentials of diaryliodonium cations and aryl radicals in acetonitrile from high-level ab initio computations. Electrochim Acta. 2020 Aug 10;351:136404.  16. Peng X, Rahim A, Peng W, et al. Recent Progress in Cyclic Aryliodonium Chemistry: Syntheses and Applications. Chem Rev. 2022;  17. Médard J, Combellas C, Kanoufi F, et al. Patterning Surfaces through Photografting of Iodonium Salts. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2018;122(34):19722–30.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT25  18. Brantley JN, Samant A V., Toste FD. Isolation and reactivity of trifluoromethyl iodonium salts. ACS Cent Sci. 2016;2(5):341–50.  19. Van Druenen M, Davitt F, Collins T et al. Covalent Functionalization of Few-Layer Black Phosphorus Using Iodonium Salts and Comparison to Diazonium Modified Black Phosphorus. Chemistry of Materials. 2018;30(14):4667–74.  20. Smołka S, Skorupa M, Barylski A, et al. Improved adhesion and charge transfer between PEDOT:PSS and the surface of a platinum electrode through a diazonium chemistry route. Electrochem commun. 2023 Aug 1;153:107528.  21. Xia Y, Zhang H, Ouyang J. Highly conductive PEDOT:PSS films prepared through a treatment with zwitterions and their application in polymer photovoltaic cells. J Mater Chem. 2010;20(43):9740–7.  22. Bayón R, Musembi R, Belaidi A et al. Highly structured TiO2/In(OH)xSy/PbS/PEDOT:PSS to be used in photovoltaic applications. Comptes Rendus Chimie. 2006;9(5–6):730–4.  23. Adekoya GJ, Sadiku RE, Hamam Y et al. Pseudocapacitive material for energy storage application: PEDOT and PEDOT:PSS. AIP Conf Proc. 2020;2289(November).  24. Fenoy GE, Azzaroni O, Knoll W, et al. Functionalization Strategies of PEDOT and PEDOT:PSS Films for Organic Bioelectronics Applications. Chemosensors 2021, Vol 9, Page 212. 2021 Aug 6;9(8):212.  25. Wang Z, Xu J, Yao Y, et al. Facile preparation of highly water-stable and flexible PEDOT:PSS organic/inorganic composite materials and their application in electrochemical sensors. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2014;196:357–69.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT26  26. Pan Q, Wu Q, Sun Q, et al. Biomolecule-friendly conducting PEDOT interface for long-term bioelectronic devices. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2022;373(August):132703.  27. Tseghai GB, Mengistie DA, Malengier B, et al. PEDOT:PSS-based conductive textiles and their applications. Sensors (Switzerland). 2020;20(7):1–18.  28. Badawi NM, Batoo KM, Ramesh S, et al. SWCNTs/PEDOT: PSS Coated Cotton for Wearable Clothes and Supercapacitor Applications. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2023;15(1):1–18.  29. Antipova CG, Parunova YM, Vishnevskaya M V., et al. Biomechanical behaviour of PEDOT:PSS-based hydrogels as an electrode for stent integrated enzyme biofuel cells. Heliyon. 2022;8(3):e09218.  30. Bianchi M, De Salvo A, Asplund M, et al. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-Based Neural Interfaces for Recording and Stimulation: Fundamental Aspects and In Vivo Applications. Advanced Science. 2022;9(12):1–30.  31. Inoue A, Yuk H, Lu B, et al. Strong adhesion of wet conducting polymers on diverse substrates. Sci Adv. 2020;6(12):1–11.  32. Villemin E, Lemarque B, Vũ TT, et al. Improved adhesion of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) thin film to solid substrates using electrografted promoters and application to efficient nanoplasmonic devices. Synth Met. 2019;248:45–52.  33. Christopher Setiawan R, Li DY. Increased Adhesion Force Due to Increased Conductivity in PEDOT:PSS/PEO Spun-coated Nanofilm. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theoretical and Applied Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (TANN’21). 2021;(117):3–6.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT27  34. Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Mittelstadt FG, et al. Effects of diphenyliodonium salt addition on the adhesive and mechanical properties of an experimental adhesive. J Dent. 2013 Jul 1;41(7):653–8.  35. Augusto CR, Leitune VCB, Ogliari FA, et al. Influence of an iodonium salt on the properties of dual-polymerizing self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Aug 1;118(2):228–34.  36. Leal FB, Lima GS, Collares FM, et al. Iodonium salt improves the dentin bonding performance in an experimental dental adhesive resin. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2012 Oct 1;38:1–4.  37. Ferrúa CP, Leal FB, de Oliveira Gazal M, et al. Iodonium salt incorporation in dental adhesives and its relation with degree of conversion, ultimate tensile strength, cell viability, and oxidative stress. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar 1;23(3):1143–51.  38. A. S. Bondarenko, G. A. Ragoisha. EIS Spectrum Analyser. 2008;  39. Krukiewicz K, Kruk A, Turczyn R. Evaluation of drug loading capacity and release characteristics of PEDOT/naproxen system: Effect of doping ions. Electrochim Acta. 2018 Nov;289:218–27.  40. Lipus J, Krukiewicz K. Challenges and limitations of using charge storage capacity to assess capacitance of biomedical electrodes. Measurement (Lond). 2022;191(February):110822.  41. Koefoed L, Vase KH, Stenlid JH, et al. On the Kinetic and Thermodynamic Properties of Aryl Radicals Using Electrochemical and Theoretical Approaches. ChemElectroChem. 2017 Dec 1;4(12):3212–21.  42. Combellas C, Jiang DE, Kanoufi F, et al. Steric effects in the reaction of aryl radicals on surfaces. Langmuir. 2009;25(1):286–93.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT28  43. Steeno R, Rodríguez González MC, Eyley S, et al. Covalent Functionalization of Carbon Surfaces: Diaryliodonium versus Aryldiazonium Chemistry. Chemistry of Materials. 2020;32(12):5246–55.  44. Miliutina E, Guselnikova O, Soldatova NS, et al. Can Plasmon Change Reaction Path? Decomposition of Unsymmetrical Iodonium Salts as an Organic Probe. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2020 Jul 16;11(14):5770–6.  45. Bender TA, Morimoto M, Bergman RG, et al. Supramolecular Host-Selective Activation of Iodoarenes by Encapsulated Organometallics. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(4):1701–6.  46. Website. https://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductChemicalPropertiesCB0700740_EN.htm (accessed 25/11/2023) [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductChemicalPropertiesCB0700740_EN.htm 47. Website. https://www.smolecule.com/products/s565465 (accessed 25/11/2023) [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.smolecule.com/products/s565465 48. Li W, Wang X, Wu Y, et al. One-step spontaneous grafting via diazonium chemistry for the fabrication of robust bionic multifunctional superhydrophobic fabric. Surf Coat Technol. 2021;407(199):126802.  49. Chau TT, Bruckard WJ, Koh PTL, et al. A review of factors that affect contact angle and implications for flotation practice. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;150(2):106–15.  50. Ryan BJ, Poduska KM. Roughness effects on contact angle measurements. Am J Phys. 2008 Nov 1;76(11):1074–7.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT29  51. Arima Y, Iwata H. Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials. 2007 Jul 1;28(20):3074–82.  52. Lee HY, Qu J. An interpretation of the failure paths of roughened metal/polymer interfaces. Metals and Materials International. 2001;7(2):101–5.  53. Cui X, Martin DC. Fuzzy gold electrodes for lowering impedance and improving adhesion with electrodeposited conducting polymer films. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2003;103(3):384–94.  54. Green RA, Hassarati RT, Bouchinet L, et al. Substrate dependent stability of conducting polymer coatings on medical electrodes. Biomaterials. 2012;33(25):5875–86.  55. Smołka S, Skorupa M, Fołta K, et al. Antibacterial coatings for electroceutical devices based on PEDOT decorated with gold and silver particles. Bioelectrochemistry. 2023;153(October 2022).  56. Stilling J, Ullah N, Omanovic S. Ir-ni oxide as a promising material for nerve and brain stimulating electrodes. Journal of Electrochemical Science and Engineering. 2014;4(3):85–96.  57. Lee I, Park S, Lee YS, et al. Gradual Morphological Change in PEDOT:PSS Thin Films Immersed in an Aqueous Solution. Langmuir. 2023 Jan 31;39(4):1600–10.  58. Kim SM, Kim CH, Kim Y, et al. Influence of PEDOT:PSS crystallinity and composition on electrochemical transistor performance and long-term stability. Nature Communications 2018 9:1. 2018 Sep 21;9(1):1–9.  59. Chiu WW, Travaš-Sejdić J, Cooney RP, et al.  Studies of dopant effects in poly(3,4-ethylenedi-oxythiophene) using Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy. 2006 Dec 1;37(12):1354–61.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT30  60. Nešpůrek S, Kuberský P, Polanský R, et al. Raman spectroscopy and DFT calculations of PEDOT:PSS in a dipolar field. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2021 Dec 22;24(1):541–50.      ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT31  Figures  Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of the process of electroreduction of 3 mM solutions of iodonium salts:  A) bis(4-tertbutylphenyl) iodonium hexafluorophosphate (Salt A), B) (4-nitrophenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)iodonium triflate (Salt B), C) diphenyliodonium chloride (Salt C) and D) bis(4-methylphenyl)iodonium hexafluorophosphate (Salt D). ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT32    Figure 2. The general mechanism of electroreduction of iodonium salts, and the chemical structures of post-iodonium compounds grafted to the surface of Pt: A) mechanism of the formation of aryl radical (first step) and the attachment of the radical ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT33  on the Pt electrode (second step) with further formation of multilayers with successive cycles (third step); B) mechanism of bond cleavage, aryl radical formation and attachment of the radical to the Pt electrode for Salt B. Mechanism pathway 2 shows the actual process taking place during the electroreduction.    Figure 3. Change in mass deposited on the electrode depending on the number of reduction CV cycles for iodonium Salts A-D. Mass of the deposit resulting from the electroreduction of Salt C was recalculated to eliminate the effect of insoluble iodobenzene.      Figure 4. Wettability (A) and roughness (B) analysis of electrode surfaces modified with electrodeposited iodonium salts compared with a bare Pt electrode.  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT FigurplatinFigurlayerExpelinesre 5. AFM inum electrore 6. EIS dars: impedanerimental da. images collode, comparata in the fonce module vata are preselected after tred with therm of Bodevs. frequencented as dot34 the electrode pristine plae plots of Ptcy (A), phasts, while simdeposition oatinum subs electrodes se angle vs.mulated speof the iodonistrate. modified w frequency ctra are prenium salts onwith organic(B). esented as son the   olid  ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT35    Figure 7. Electrochemical characterization of PEDOT:PSS deposited on Pt electrodes modified with organic layers: A) CV curves; B) charge storage capacities as a function of a scan rate; C) impedance module vs. frequency Bode plot, with the circuits (1) Pt/Salt/PEDOT:PSS, (2) Pt/PEDOT:PSS; D) phase angle vs. frequency Bode plot.  Experimental data are presented as dots, while simulated spectra are presented as solid lines.    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT36   Figure 8.  A) UV-Vis spectra of PBS solution after 30 days of ageing in the spectral region from 230 nm to 310 nm; inset: UV-Vis spectra of PEDOT:PSS in the range from 220 nm to 500 nm; B) CV curves for samples after ageing (solid lines) and before (dashed lines) at scan rate = 100 mV/s; C) Decrease in CSC values at scan rate = 100 mV/s for samples after 30 days of ageing test.    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT37    Figure 9. Raman spectra of Pt/Salt/PEDOT:PSS electrodes after a tape test; red spectra represent the electrodes before a tape test, and black spectra represent the electrodes after a tape test with the inset showing the images of the area of the experiment.    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT38  Tables Table 1. Summary of the electrical properties of electrodeposited samples derived from the equivalent circuit analysis; RS – solution resistance, CPE – constant phase element, n,P – parameters of CPE, RCT – charge transfer resistance, Aw – Warburg diffusion coefficient,  χ2 – goodness of fit.  Table 2. Summary of the electrical properties of electrodeposited samples functionalized with PEDOT:PSS derived from the equivalent circuit analysis; RS – solution resistance, RCT – charge transfer resistance, CPE – constant phase element, n1,2,P1,2 – parameters of CPE1,2, χ2 – goodness of fit; for Pt/PEDOT; P1,n1 – parameters of CPE, Aw1 – Warburg diffusion coefficient.    Samples RS (Ω) n (CPE1) P∙105  RCT (kΩ) C (µF) AW (kΩ/s1/2) χ2 (%) Salt A 153 ± 1 0.911 ± 0.002 2.03 ± 0.02 56.1 ± 1.8 58.1 ± 0.1 2.572 ± 0.001 2.0 Salt B 178 ± 3 0.809 ± 0.006 4.61 ± 0.11 21.0 ± 1.9 693.5 ± 0.1 2.878 ± 0.002 5.2 Salt C 98 ± 1 0.895 ± 0.002 0.92 ± 0.01 450.9 ± 78.8 47.1 ± 0.2 67.461 ± 0.058 2.7 Salt D 133 ± 1 0.892 ± 0.002 0.82 ± 0.01 61.7 ± 1.4 30.4 ± 0.2 0.301 ± 0.001 2.3 Pt 141 ± 4 0.913 ± 0.007 1.62 ± 0.05 12.3 ± 0.7 42.2 ± 0.1  1.580 ± 0.001 6.9 Samples Rs (Ω) RCT (Ω) P1∙105  n1  P2∙103  n2  AW (kΩ/s1/2) χ2 (%) Pt/Salt A/PEDOT:PSS 101.2 ± 0.4 8.1 ± 1.0 235.04 ± 0.18 0.58 ± 0.02 6.56 ± 0.17 0.88 ± 0.01 - 1.34 Pt/Salt B/PEDOT:PSS 98.9 ± 0.5 32.1 ± 0.8 6.81 ± 0.56 0.88 ± 0.01 9.54 ± 0.22 0.79 ± 0.01 - 1.35 Pt/Salt C/PEDOT:PSS 94.7 ± 0.6 38.8 ± 0.9 4.98 ± 0.38 0.87 ± 0.01 7.49 ± 0.18 0.82 ± 0.01 - 1.56 Pt/Salt D/PEDOT:PSS 99.8 ± 0.4 16.8 ± 0.6 13.64 ± 0.18 0.83 ± 0.01 10.07 ± 0.02 0.81 ± 0.01 - 0.38 Pt/PEDOT:PSS 113.4 ± 0.7 100 ± 8.9 0.02 ± 0.01 1.00 ± 0.01 - - 96.6 ± 2.6 1.18 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT39  Impact statement  Adhesion and charge transfer between PEDOT:PSS and the surface of the electrode are significantly improved by a simple electrode modification strategy using the electrochemical grafting of commercially available iodonium salts.     ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT GA  40