# Fileset

[Epitaxial growth of phase-pure ε-Ga2O3 by halide vapor.pdf](https://mdr.nims.go.jp/filesets/8e7feea0-d26f-4564-a285-230a41c7e8f0/download)

## Creator

[Yuichi Oshima](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8293-4891), Encarnación G. Víllora, [Yoshitaka Matsushita](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4968-8905), [Satoshi Yamamoto](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1171-7723), [Kiyoshi Shimamura](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6502-8731)

## Rights

This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and AIP Publishing. This article appeared in Yuichi Oshima et al., J. Appl. Phys. 118, 085301 (2015)  and may be found at https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417.[In Copyright](http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/)

## Other metadata

[Epitaxial growth of phase-pure e-Ga2O3 by halide vapor phase epitaxy](https://mdr.nims.go.jp/datasets/872cc017-ad58-4159-b762-21f77d8f0488)

## Fulltext

Epitaxial growth of phase-pure ε-Ga2O3 by halide vapor phase epitaxyViewOnlineExportCitationCrossMarkRESEARCH ARTICLE |  AUGUST 24 2015Epitaxial growth of phase-pure ε-Ga2O3 by halide vaporphase epitaxy Yuichi Oshima; Encarnación G. Víllora; Yoshitaka Matsushita; Satoshi Yamamoto; Kiyoshi ShimamuraJ. Appl. Phys. 118, 085301 (2015)https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417 30 January 2024 06:28:16https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/118/8/085301/141798/Epitaxial-growth-of-phase-pure-Ga2O3-by-halidehttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/118/8/085301/141798/Epitaxial-growth-of-phase-pure-Ga2O3-by-halide?pdfCoverIconEvent=citehttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/118/8/085301/141798/Epitaxial-growth-of-phase-pure-Ga2O3-by-halide?pdfCoverIconEvent=crossmarkjavascript:;javascript:;javascript:;javascript:;javascript:;javascript:;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417https://servedbyadbutler.com/redirect.spark?MID=176720&plid=2288747&setID=592934&channelID=0&CID=840257&banID=521619172&PID=0&textadID=0&tc=1&scheduleID=2208988&adSize=1640x440&data_keys=%7B%22%22%3A%22%22%7D&matches=%5B%22inurl%3A%5C%2Fjap%22%5D&mt=1706596096011293&spr=1&referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fpubs.aip.org%2Faip%2Fjap%2Farticle-pdf%2Fdoi%2F10.1063%2F1.4929417%2F13023421%2F085301_1_online.pdf&hc=cb0a25e816d535a5af8aa392f72551cbe723ff23&location=Epitaxial growth of phase-pure e-Ga2O3 by halide vapor phase epitaxyYuichi Oshima,1,a) Encarnaci�on G. V�ıllora,1 Yoshitaka Matsushita,2 Satoshi Yamamoto,3and Kiyoshi Shimamura11Optical Single Crystals Group, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba,Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan2Materials Analysis Station, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba,Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan3Optoelectronic Materials Group, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba,Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan(Received 18 July 2015; accepted 11 August 2015; published online 24 August 2015)Epitaxial growth of e-Ga2O3 is demonstrated for the first time. The e-Ga2O3 films are grown onGaN (0001), AlN (0001), and b-Ga2O3 (�201) by halide vapor phase epitaxy at 550 �C usinggallium chloride and O2 as precursors. X-ray x-2h and pole figure measurements prove that phase-pure e-Ga2O3 (0001) films are epitaxially grown on the three kinds of substrates, although someminor misoriented domains are observed. High temperature X-ray diffraction measurements revealthat the e-Ga2O3 is thermally stable up to approximately 700 �C. The optical bandgap of e-Ga2O3 isdetermined for the first time to be 4.9 eV. VC 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417]I. INTRODUCTIONGa2O3 has been reported to possess five different crystalstructures, namely, a-, b-, d-, e-, and c-phase.1 Among them,b-Ga2O3 crystallizes in the monoclinic structure (spacegroup C2/m) and is believed to be thermodynamically themost stable under atmospheric pressure. b-Ga2O3 has abandgap energy as large as 4.7–4.9 eV, and therefore, itexhibits a wide transparency even in the UV region.2–4 Inaddition, b-Ga2O3 is a semiconductor, with Si and Sn as themost efficient donors.5,6 Furthermore, high-quality singlecrystalline wafers can be produced through melt growthtechniques.7–9 These unique features make this material asuitable and promising wide bandgap semiconductor fordiverse applications such as conductive transparent sub-strates for GaN-based high-performance LEDs,10,11 andsolar-blind UV sensors.12 Above and beyond these, b-Ga2O3is also attracting a remarkable attention due to its greatpotential to realize power devices with higher breakdownvoltages and lower energy losses than its counterparts GaNand SiC.13–15In contrast to b-Ga2O3, there are only a limited numberof reports on e-Ga2O3, the target material of this work.e-Ga2O3 is one of the meta-stable phases of Ga2O3, whichwas first synthesized by Roy et al. through the thermaldecomposition of Ga(NO3)3.1 Although they indicated a highthermal stability of their e-Ga2O3 up to 870 �C, the full struc-tural characterization was not made, and the crystal structureremained unclear for over half a century. Recently, Playfordet al. carried out the structural analysis of their powder mate-rial synthesized through the thermal decomposition ofGa(NO3)3�9H2O, and finally identified the crystal structureof e-Ga2O3, belonging to the high symmetry hexagonal sys-tem with space group P63mc (PDF# 01–082-3196),16 likehexagonal GaN. In any case, the samples prepared by bothauthors suffered from low phase-purity. Even the best mate-rial of Playford et al. was still a mixture of e-Ga2O3 (57%)and b-Ga2O3 (43%).As described above, the synthesis of e-Ga2O3 has so farbeen limited to powdered materials with a lack of phase-purity, so that, till date, even very fundamental properties,such as the bandgap energy, are still unknown. However, thee-phase is expected to have a sufficient thermal stability forpractical device applications, and therefore, e-Ga2O3 couldbe a wide bandgap semiconductor as promising as b-Ga2O3.In order to clarify the material properties, first of all, asynthesis technique which enables the effective growth ofe-Ga2O3 with high phase-purity and low impurity concentra-tions has to be established. On top of that, it is necessary todevelop an epitaxial growth technique to deposit this mate-rial for semiconductor device applications.In this work, we employed halide vapor phase epitaxy(HVPE) as the growth method of e-Ga2O3. HVPE is a type ofchemical vapor deposition (CVD), which has been widelyused to grow high-quality epilayers with large growth rates inthe III-V compound semiconductor industry.17,18 Recently,HVPE has been successfully applied for the growth ofb-Ga2O319–21 and even a-Ga2O3.22 The present work is thefirst report on the epitaxial growth of e-Ga2O3 layers.II. EXPERIMENTAL METHODThe HVPE growth was carried out in a horizontalatmospheric reactor at 550 �C using gallium chloride and O2(>99.99995% pure) as precursors. The gallium chloride wassynthesized in situ upstream in the reactor through the chem-ical reaction between Ga (>99.99999% pure) and HCl(>99.999% pure). The HCl and O2 were supplied with par-tial pressures of 0.25 kPa and 1.0 kPa, respectively. N2(>99.9999% pure) was flown together with the precursors asa)Electronic mail: OSHIMA.Yuichi@nims.go.jp0021-8979/2015/118(8)/085301/5/$30.00 VC 2015 AIP Publishing LLC118, 085301-1JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 118, 085301 (2015) 30 January 2024 06:28:16http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417mailto:OSHIMA.Yuichi@nims.go.jphttp://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1063/1.4929417&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2015-08-24the carrier gas. The growth times were 2 min or 7 min. Threedifferent substrates were tried, namely, c-plane GaN sub-strates, c-plane AlN(13-lm-thick)/SiC templates, and (�201)b-Ga2O3 substrates.The surface and the cross-section of the films wereobserved by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The crys-tal structure and the orientation were investigated by X-raydiffraction (XRD) x-2h scan and pole-figure measurements.The structural quality was estimated by X-ray rocking curve(XRC) measurements. To clarify the thermal stability of thee-Ga2O3, high-temperature X-ray diffraction (HT-XRD)studies were carried out. The sample was set on a Pt holderand its temperature was elevated from room temperature upto 1300 �C stepwise, with 30 min intervals for temperaturestabilization. The XRD patterns were recorded under air inthe standard x-2h scan mode. Impurity concentrations wereevaluated by secondary mass spectrometry (SIMS). The opti-cal bandgap was determined by means of a transmittancemeasurement.III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSEM images of the surface and the cross-section of thefilms grown on GaN (0001) for 2 min and 7 min are shown inFigs. 1(a)–1(d), respectively. Smooth compact layers weresuccessfully grown, although some three-dimensional (3D)grains can be observed on the surface. The growth rate of thefilm was estimated to be approximately 20 lm/h from Fig.1(d). The crystal structure and the orientation of the 3D-grains are unclear at present. As can be seen in Fig. 1(d),these are originated at the interface with the substrate; thus,their surface density was independent of the growth time.Furthermore, as the 3D-grains grew laterally and verticallyfaster than the epilayer, the grain-size increased continu-ously, becoming more protruding with the growth time.Therefore, it is necessary to improve the growth conditionsat the early growth stage, during the nucleation, in order tosuppress the formation of the 3D-grains.Figures 2 and 3 show top-view SEM images of the filmsdeposited on AlN (0001) and b-Ga2O3 (�201), respectively.The morphologies were similar to that of the film grown onGaN (0001); however, the 3D-grain density on b-Ga2O3(�201) was significantly higher. In the following, only theresults on the 7-min-grown samples (approximately 2.3 lmthick) are described, unless otherwise specified.Figure 4 shows the XRD x-2h scan profiles of theHVPE-grown films on the three kinds of substrates. In all ofthese cases, apart from the diffraction peaks correspondingto the substrates, only the diffraction peaks from e-Ga2O3(0001) appeared, and no other polymorphs of Ga2O3 weredetected.The pole figures of the e-Ga2O3 film and the correspond-ing GaN substrate are shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b), respec-tively. Diffraction spots of e-Ga2O3 10�14 appeared only atthe positions expected for single crystalline e-Ga2O3. The3D-grains observed by SEM in Figs. 1(a) and 1(c) may bemisoriented domains of e-Ga2O3, but no corresponding peakswere detected probably due to the small volume fraction.FIG. 1. SEM images of e-Ga2O3 layers grown on GaN (0001) with differentgrowth times: (a) and (b) 2 min; and (c) and (d) 7 min.FIG. 2. SEM images of e-Ga2O3 layers grown on AlN (0001) with differentgrowth times: (a) 2 min and (b) 7 min.FIG. 3. SEM images of e-Ga2O3 layers grown on b-Ga2O3 (�201) with differ-ent growth times: (a) 2 min and (b) 7 min.FIG. 4. XRD x-2h scan profiles of e-Ga2O3 layers grown on (a) GaN(0001), (b) AlN (0001), and (c) b-Ga2O3 (�201).085301-2 Oshima et al. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 085301 (2015) 30 January 2024 06:28:16The comparison of the peak positions in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b)revealed the following epitaxial relationships: e-Ga2O3(0001)jjGaN (0001) and e-Ga2O3 [10�10]jjGaN [10�10].Analogously, the pole figures of the e-Ga2O3 film and thecorresponding AlN (0001) template were similar (Figs. 6(a)and 6(b)), and the epitaxial relationships were elucidated tobe equally e-Ga2O3 (0001)jjAlN (0001) and e-Ga2O3[10�10]jjAlN [10�10]. The in-plane lattice mismatches are 8.8and 6.6% with GaN (0001) and AlN(0001), respectively.Figures 7(a) and 7(b) show the pole figures of thee-Ga2O3 film and the corresponding b-Ga2O3 (�201) sub-strate, respectively. In contrast with the case on the GaN andAlN substrates, additional very small diffraction peaks ofe-Ga2O3 were detected probably due to the larger volumefraction of the 3D-grains. The epitaxial relationshipsbetween the c-plane e-Ga2O3 and the substrate were deter-mined to be e-Ga2O3 (0001)jjb-Ga2O3 (�201) and e-Ga2O3[10�10]jjb-Ga2O3 [102]. This result is in good accordancewith the observed growth of hexagonal GaN on the samesubstrate.23 Further, the in-plane atomic arrangement of Gaor O in both e-Ga2O3 (0001) and b-Ga2O3 (�201) are virtuallytriangular lattices, and the mismatch is as small as 1.1%.It is worth mentioning that the crystal structure ofGa2O3 has been reported to suit that of the substrate flexibly.For example, corundum-structured a-Ga2O3 was grown on c-plane sapphire under the same growth conditions as in thepresent work.22 It is also reported that cubic c-Ga2O3 wasgrown on spinel (100) (the both materials belong to the samespace group Fd�3m) by mist-CVD, while a-Ga2O3 was grownon c-plane sapphire under the similar growth condition.24Therefore, it seems natural that e-Ga2O3 can grow on GaNand AlN, since all belong to the same space group P63mc.However, at first sight, it is surprising that e-Ga2O3 grows“heteroepitaxially” on b-Ga2O3, which is believed to be themost stable polymorph of Ga2O3. It should be noted that theuse of similar growth conditions, except for the highergrowth temperatures around 1050 �C, leads to the growth ofthe b-phase.21 Further investigations including the surfacestructure of b-Ga2O3 (�201) at the atomic level in the growthatmosphere of HVPE will be needed to clarify the mecha-nism of this unusual phenomenon.The XRC profiles of the e-Ga2O3 0004 and 10�11 diffrac-tions, which were measured in symmetric and skew-symmetric geometries, respectively, are shown in Fig. 8. TheFWHMs of 0004 and 10�11 diffractions reflect the tilting ofc-plane and the twisting around the c-axis, respectively. TheFWHMs of e-Ga2O3 grown on GaN and AlN were similar,FIG. 5. X-ray pole figures (log-scale) of (a) e-Ga2O3 10�14 and (b) GaN10�12.FIG. 6. X-ray pole figures (log-scale) of (a) e-Ga2O3 10�14 and (b) AlN10�13.FIG. 7. X-ray pole figures (log-scale) of (a) e-Ga2O3 10�14 and (b) b-Ga2O3002. Note that the b-Ga2O3�202 peak also appears because the (001) and(�101) planes have almost the same spacing and thus the same Bragg angle.FIG. 8. XRCs of e-Ga2O3 layers grown on (a) GaN (0001), (b) AlN (0001),and (c) b-Ga2O3 (�201).085301-3 Oshima et al. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 085301 (2015) 30 January 2024 06:28:16while those of e-Ga2O3 deposited on b-Ga2O3 were muchsmaller. This tendency agrees well with that of the in-planelattice mismatch. Note that the 0004 XRC profile of thee-Ga2O3 grown on b-Ga2O3 (�201) was measured around therocking axis of b-Ga2O3 [010], and the FWHM was not sig-nificantly different from that measured around the perpendic-ular rocking axis of b-Ga2O3 [102].Figure 9 shows the result of the HT-XRD measurementsof the e-Ga2O3 grown on GaN. Apart from the substrate andPt holder diffractions, the spectra are dominated by the dif-fraction peak of e-Ga2O3 up to 700 �C. With the furtherincrease of temperature, the b-Ga2O3 401 peak appears andits intensity increases with the temperature up to around800 �C. Inversely, the intensity of the e-Ga2O3 0004 diffrac-tion peak starts to decrease above 700 �C, and virtually dis-appears around 800 �C. Thus, the HVPE-grown e-Ga2O3 isfound to be thermally stable up to around 700 �C, and ittransforms into b-Ga2O3 at higher temperatures. Thereported transition temperature from e-Ga2O3 to b-Ga2O3varies depending on the authors. Roy et al. and Playfordet al. reported the temperature to be 870 �C (Ref. 1) andabove 500 �C,16 respectively. Their samples were synthe-sized by the thermal decomposition of gallium nitrate, andtherefore, the impurities and their concentrations are prob-ably different from those in HVPE-grown e-Ga2O3. Such dif-ference could be the origin of the different transitiontemperatures, since impurities sometimes affect the crystalstructure of Ga2O3. For example, Hayashi et al. demon-strated the growth of Mn-doped c-Ga2O3 (7 at. %) on c-planesapphire by pulsed laser deposition, while their un-dopedsample crystalized in the b-Ga2O3 phase.25Table I summarizes the impurity concentrations in e-Ga2O3 grown on GaN measured by SIMS. [C], [N], [Si],[Al], [Cr], [Fe], and [Ni] were below the detection limits.[H] and [Cl] were relatively higher than those in a-Ga2O3grown under the same growth conditions in the same HVPEreactor ([H]< 4� 1017, [Cl]¼ 7 � 1016).22 Although theinfluence of H or Cl impurities on the electrical properties ofe-Ga2O3 has not clarified yet, it is worth mentioning thatMurakami et al. has also reported the incorporation of Cl im-purity in HVPE-grown b-Ga2O3, and that this did not act as adonor.20The transmittance spectrum of e-Ga2O3 grown onAlN(0001)/SiC template for 2 min is shown in Fig. 10. Priorto the measurement, the SiC substrate was removed by lap-ping and polishing in order to avoid the absorption cutoff ofthis. Although the transition type of e-Ga2O3 is stillunknown, we estimated the bandgap energy to be 4.9 eVfrom the (h�a)2–h� plot (inset of Fig. 10), in which the linerfitting is much better than that in (h�a)1/2–h� plot (notshown). This result indicates that the bandgap energy is simi-lar to that of b-Ga2O3, and therefore, opto-electrical proper-ties in general might be comparable for both phases.IV. SUMMARYIn conclusion, the present investigation demonstrates forthe first time the successful epitaxial growth of phase-puree-Ga2O3. The epilayers were deposited by the HVPE method,achieving a growth rate as high as 20 lm/h. It was found thatthe use of c-plane GaN and AlN substrates, whose spacegroup is the same as that of e-Ga2O3, is one of the key pointsto deposit e-Ga2O3 epitaxial layers. The second critical param-eter was the deposition temperature, so that e-Ga2O3 could begrown heteroepitaxially even on b-Ga2O3 (�201) substrates. ItFIG. 9. HT-XRD of e-Ga2O3 grown on GaN (0001).TABLE I. Impurity concentrations in e-Ga2O3 measured by SIMS.ElementPossibleoriginDetection limit(D. L.) (cm�3)Concentration(cm�3)H HCl 4� 1017 1� 1018C SiC, graphite 6� 1016 <D. L.N GaN, AlN 5� 1016 <D. L.Al AlN 3� 1015 <D. L.Si Quartz 1� 1016 <D. L.Cl HCl 1� 1016 2� 1018Cr Stainless steel 4� 1014 <D. L.Fe Stainless steel 8� 1014 <D. L.Ni Stainless steel 3� 1015 <D. L.FIG. 10. Transmittance spectra of e-Ga2O3. The inset shows the absorptioncoefficient in (h�a)2 vs h�.085301-4 Oshima et al. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 085301 (2015) 30 January 2024 06:28:16was found that the e-Ga2O3 film grown on b-Ga2O3 (�201)exhibits better XRC-FWHM compared to those of the e-Ga2O3 films grown on GaN and AlN, probably due to thesmaller lattice mismatch, although the volume fraction of the3D-grains, which are considered to be misoriented domains,was significantly higher than that on other two substrates. HT-XRD measurement revealed the high thermal stability of thee-Ga2O3 films up to around 700 �C. The result of SIMS mea-surement showed that [H] and [Cl] were relatively higher thanthose in a-Ga2O3 grown under the same growth conditions,while [C], [N], [Si], [Al], [Cr], [Fe], and [Ni] were below thedetection limits. The optical bandgap was determined for thefirst time to be 4.9 eV, which is comparable to that of b-Ga2O3. These results prove the superior effectiveness ofHVPE as epitaxial growth technique for e-Ga2O3, and furthersuggest that e-Ga2O3 can be a new promising wide bandgapsemiconductor.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid forScientific Research (C) No. 25420307 from Japan Societyfor the Promotion of Science (JSPS).1R. Roy, V. G. Hill, and E. F. Osborn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 719 (1952).2H. H. Tippins, Phys. Rev. 140, A316 (1965).3M. R. Lorenz, J. F. Woods, and R. J. Gambino, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28,403 (1967).4M. Orita, H. Ohta, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 4166(2000).5N. Suzuki, S. Ohira, M. Tanaka, T. Sugawara, K. Nakajima, and T.Shishido, Phys. Status Solidi C 4, 2310 (2007).6E. G. V�ıllora, K. Shimamura, Y. Yoshikawa, T. Ujiie, and K. Aoki, Appl.Phys. Lett. 92, 202120 (2008).7H. Aida, K. Nishiguchi, H. Takeda, N. Aota, K. Sunakawa, and Y.Yaguchi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 47, 8506 (2008).8E. G. V�ıllora, K. Shimamura, Y. Yoshikawa, K. Aoki, and N. Ichinose,J. Cryst. Growth 270, 420 (2004).9Z. Galazka, K. Irmscher, R. Uecker, R. Bertram, M. Pietsch, A.Kwasniewski, M. Naumann, T. Schulz, R. Schewski, D. Klimm, and M.Bickermann, J. Cryst. Growth 404, 184 (2014).10K. Shimamura, E. G. V�ıllora, K. Domen, K. Yui, K. Aoki, and N.Ichinose, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 44, L7 (2005).11E. G. V�ıllora, S. Arjoca, K. Shimamura, D. Inomata, and K. Aoki, Proc.SPIE 8987, 89871U (2014).12T. Oshima, T. Okuno, N. Arai, N. Suzuki, S. Ohira, and S. Fujita, Appl.Phys. Express 1, 011202 (2008).13K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, T. Masui, E. G. V�ıllora, K. Shimamura, and S.Yamakoshi, Appl. Phys. Express 5, 035502 (2012).14M. Higashiwaki, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, T. Masui, and S. Yamakoshi,Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 013504 (2012).15M. Higashiwaki, K. Sasaki, T. Kamimura, M. H. Wong, D.Krishnamurthy, A. Kuramata, T. Masui, and S. Yamakoshi, Appl. Phys.Lett. 103, 123511 (2013).16H. Y. Playford, A. C. Hannon, E. R. Barney, and R. I. Walton, Chem. Eur. J.19, 2803 (2013).17Y. Oshima, T. Eri, M. Shibata, H. Sunakawa, K. Kobayashi, T. Ichihashi,and A. Usui, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 42, L1 (2003).18K. Motoki, T. Okahisa, R. Hirota, S. Nakahata, K. Uematsu, and N.Matsumoto, J. Cryst. Growth 305, 377 (2007).19K. Nomura, K. Goto, R. Togashi, H. Murakami, Y. Kumagai, A.Kuramata, S. Yamakoshi, and A. Koukitu, J. Cryst. Growth 405, 19(2014).20H. Murakami, K. Nomura, K. Goto, K. Sasaki, K. Kawara, Q. T. Thieu, R.Togashi, Y. Kumagai, M. Higashiwaki, A. Kuramata, S. Yamakoshi, B.Monemar, and A. Koukitu, Appl. Phys. Express 8, 015503 (2015).21Y. Oshima., E. G. V�ıllora, and K. Shimamura, J. Cryst. Growth 410, 53(2015).22Y. Oshima., E. G. V�ıllora, and K. Shimamura, Appl. Phys. Express 8,055501 (2015).23M. M. Muhammed, M. Peres, Y. Yamashita, Y. Morishima, S. Sato, N.Franco, K. Lorenz, A. Kuramata, and I. S. Roqan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105,042112 (2014).24T. Oshima, T. Nakazono, A. Mukai, and A. Ohtomo, J. Cryst. Growth 359,60 (2012).25H. Hayashi, R. Huang, H. Ikeno, F. Oba, S. Yoshioka, I. o Tanaka, and S.Sonoda, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 181903 (2006).085301-5 Oshima et al. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 085301 (2015) 30 January 2024 06:28:16http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja01123a039http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A316http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(67)90305-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1330559http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200674884http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2919728http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2919728http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.47.8506http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.06.027http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.07.021http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.44.L7http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2039305http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2039305http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/APEX.1.011202http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/APEX.1.011202http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/APEX.5.035502http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3674287http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4821858http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4821858http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201203359http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.42.L1http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.03.038http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.06.051http://dx.doi.org/10.7567/APEX.8.015503http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.10.038http://dx.doi.org/10.7567/APEX.8.055501http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4891761http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.08.025http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2369541